anala (v rit)
Ni nujno, da je to napisal peder. Pa ti, si že kaj analiziral svojo homofobnost. Baje gre pri homofobih za najhujše pedre. Za smejat se. No, meni gre ob tvoji nevednosti in primitivnosti bolj na jok.
[/quote]
Itak, zopet tista pederska taktika, da so tisti proti vam eni izmed vas. A potem tudi ljudje, ki so proti pedofiliji v bistvu krijejo svojo privlačnost do otrok? Pedri nimajo logike, to je jasno.
Se hudo motite. Špartanci so bolj cenili homoseksualni odnos od heteroseksualnega. S tem so utrjevali svoje bojne vrste.
Podobno je bil rimski cesar Klavdij prvi, ki si pomehkuženo ni omislil moškega ljubimca, za kar so ga postrani gledali češ, da nima jajc, da upa seksat samo z nežnimi, mehkimi ženskicami.. nič moškega ni v njem!
Zgolj na felatio (blow job) so gledali Rimljani tako kot ste zapisali: sužnji so ga lahko izvajali, svobodni ljudje ne. Prejemnik felatia pa ni bil v ničemer kaznovan, še manj zasmehovan.
Busines as usual.
Papež ima celo skrivno zbirko antičnih pregrešnih del, ki so jih vso zgodovino umikali izpred oči javnosti.. ker prikazujejo marsikaj tistega, kar cerkev uradno preganja.
Ampak, ko je prišlo do odkritja Pompejev in Herkliona.. je bilo tega preprosto preveč (mozaikov ne moreš kar izpuliti), da bi se lahko še pretvarjali kakšna je bila dejanska rimska druža in ne PRovsko popeglana verzija Rimsko katoliške cerkve.
[/quote]
Nič se ne motim.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality_in_ancient_Greece#In_the_military
“Given the importance in Greek society of cultivating the masculinity of the adult male and the perceived feminizing effect of being the passive partner, relations between adult men of comparable social status were considered highly problematic, and usually associated with social stigma.[13] This stigma, however, was reserved for only the passive partner in the relationship. According to contemporary opinion, Greek males who engaged in passive anal sex after reaching the age of manhood – at which point they were expected to take the reverse role in pederastic relationships and become the active and dominant member – thereby were feminized or “made a woman” of themselves. There is ample evidence in the theater of Aristophanes that derides these passive men and gives a glimpse of the type of biting social opprobrium and shame (“atimia”) heaped upon them by their society.[citation needed] Regardless of the opprobrium, homosexual behavior was common among men of all classes despite the protocols and conventions surrounding it, Hubbard, op. cit. p. 7. “
Ali je citirano potrebno prevajati?
Pa v razmislek, ali bi družba kjer je bil življenskega pomena razplod bojevnikov, bolj cenila odnose kjer se le teh ne dobi?
Itak, zopet tista pederska taktika, da so tisti proti vam eni izmed vas. A potem tudi ljudje, ki so proti pedofiliji v bistvu krijejo svojo privlačnost do otrok? Pedri nimajo logike, to je jasno.
Nič se ne motim.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality_in_ancient_Greece#In_the_military
“Given the importance in Greek society of cultivating the masculinity of the adult male and the perceived feminizing effect of being the passive partner, relations between adult men of comparable social status were considered highly problematic, and usually associated with social stigma.[13] This stigma, however, was reserved for only the passive partner in the relationship. According to contemporary opinion, Greek males who engaged in passive anal sex after reaching the age of manhood – at which point they were expected to take the reverse role in pederastic relationships and become the active and dominant member – thereby were feminized or “made a woman” of themselves. There is ample evidence in the theater of Aristophanes that derides these passive men and gives a glimpse of the type of biting social opprobrium and shame (“atimia”) heaped upon them by their society.[citation needed] Regardless of the opprobrium, homosexual behavior was common among men of all classes despite the protocols and conventions surrounding it, Hubbard, op. cit. p. 7. “
Ali je citirano potrebno prevajati?
Pa v razmislek, ali bi družba kjer je bil življenskega pomena razplod bojevnikov, bolj cenila odnose kjer se le teh ne dobi?
[/quote]
Seveda se hudo motite.. in še slabo berete poleg tega:
Homosexuality in the militaries of ancient Greece was regarded as contributing to morale.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality_in_the_militaries_of_ancient_Greece
Heterosexuality and homosexuality were both encouraged and expected at different stages in life, with homosexuality, in common with prevalent ancient Greek thought, being seen as the ideal form of love and heterosexuality as essential for procreation.
https://worldhistory.us/ancient-history/ancient-greece/were-the-spartans-gay-homosexuality-in-sparta-ancient-greece.php
Ker pa je antična Grčija uspevala nekaj stoletij, je tudi zgodovina malce bolj kompleksna: https://www.theguardian.com/books/2007/nov/10/history.society
Pri čemer se je potrebno zavedati da se dela antičnih filozofov, piscev, pesnikov itd. Niso ohranila v celoti in so dostopni le majhni delčki.. pri nekaterih pa niti eno od objavljenih del, temveč samo citati in sklici v drugih delih.
Tako je tudi Plato hkrati opeval ljubezen med moškima kot tisto najvišjo možno in potem kasneje spet obsojal kot incestno (ta del so seveda pograbili kristjani).
[img]https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1600/1*NQIjDLyd1sqe8LvvkqwFwg.jpeg[/img]
Antični napis bi se tako lahko mirno glasil:
Poznal bo le ukaz umika, če se moški boji malce ritopika.
Seveda se hudo motite.. in še slabo berete poleg tega:
Homosexuality in the militaries of ancient Greece was regarded as contributing to morale.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality_in_the_militaries_of_ancient_Greece
Heterosexuality and homosexuality were both encouraged and expected at different stages in life, with homosexuality, in common with prevalent ancient Greek thought, being seen as the ideal form of love and heterosexuality as essential for procreation.
https://worldhistory.us/ancient-history/ancient-greece/were-the-spartans-gay-homosexuality-in-sparta-ancient-greece.php
Ker pa je antična Grčija uspevala nekaj stoletij, je tudi zgodovina malce bolj kompleksna: https://www.theguardian.com/books/2007/nov/10/history.society
Pri čemer se je potrebno zavedati da se dela antičnih filozofov, piscev, pesnikov itd. Niso ohranila v celoti in so dostopni le majhni delčki.. pri nekaterih pa niti eno od objavljenih del, temveč samo citati in sklici v drugih delih.
Tako je tudi Plato hkrati opeval ljubezen med moškima kot tisto najvišjo možno in potem kasneje spet obsojal kot incestno (ta del so seveda pograbili kristjani).
[img]https://cdn-images-1.medium.com/max/1600/1*NQIjDLyd1sqe8LvvkqwFwg.jpeg[/img]
Antični napis bi se tako lahko mirno glasil:
Poznal bo le ukaz umika, če se moški boji malce ritopika.
[/quote]
Funkcionalna pismenost je pa vam tuja. Lepo sem citiral del kjer je povedano, da homoseksualnost ni bila smatrana za preferenčno na splošno v družbi, kar je bila prvotna trditev.
Ta teoriziranja o tem zakaj se vojske borijo in kako učinkovite so zaradi pedrov ki čuvajo drug drugega so obstranskega pomena.
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Homosexuality_in_ancient_Greece
“The most common form of same-sex relationships between males in Greece was paiderastia (pederasty), meaning “boy love”.”
Lepo je pojasnjeno kdo in zakaj jebe koga. Tisti v njihovih vojskah, ki so odraščali skupaj skozi svoja najstniška leta polna hormonov brez ženske družbe in potem ostali skupaj so bili v manjšini.
Hecno je tudi kako zagovorniki gejev vlačijo za vzor primer družbe kjer so ga 30 letniki radi tlačili v 13 letnike in nisem še videl, da bi koga to motilo.
Da se ne omejimo na Grke, princip v Rimu je bil isti.
“In ancient Rome, there was no vocabulary to distinguish between homosexuality and heterosexuality. Sexuality instead was defined by behavioural mannerisms , whether active or passive, in both gay and straight relationships. Roman society had a patriarchal system in which the gender role of the male was the primary authority, emphasized by the “active” masculinity as a symbol of power and status.
Men were free to have intercourse with men, but it was considered acceptable only in accordance with the law of Lex Scantinia, a Roman law that was created to penalise any male citizen of high status for taking a willing role in passive sexual behaviour. It was essentially a rule to police the masculine nature of an individual by enforcing that a freeborn Roman citizen takes the “top” or “active” role in sex. Failure to do so would bring his name and family reputation into disrepute or infamia (a loss of legal or social standing).
From a societal perspective, to be “passive” or “submissive”, threatened the very fabric of masculinity, with feminine traits, submission and passive mannerisms being an act of the lower class and slaves.”
Nikjer ni bila heteroseksualnost manjvredna v primerjavi s homoseksualnostjo, ne v antiki in tudi ne pred tem, ne v Ameriki in ne v Aziji. Edino kar je bilo so bili nivoji tolerance od družbe.
V bistvu je to celo bolje kot nič. Ritno luknjo se navadiš sproščat in raztegovat mišice, kar je dobro proti hemeroidom, kar povzročajo zategnjene in skrčene mišice. Danka je raztegljiva tako, da ni panike. Na nekaj kakca in smradu občasno se bosta morala navadit, ampak to smatrajta kot del vaju in ne kot neko svinjarijo. Danes smo še pod vplivom cerkvenih zakonov, ko se niso smeli niti dotikat pičk in kurcev, kaj šele kaj drugega. No, ostali so cerkveni pedofili.
če sta oba za takoj, 31.03.2019 ob 09:32
sva enkrat debatirala, pa sem mu rekla, da lahko v primeru, da tudi jaz njega … pa je rekel, da tega pa že ne bi … no potem pa tudi jaz ne bi … pa je bil hitr mir.
Nama pa obema paše. Jaz njo v ritko. Ona me s straponom. Neverjetno dober orgazem po vsem tem fukanju. Sprostite se in uzivajte. Lp
Forum je zaprt za komentiranje.